The Ridiculously Thorough Guide to Making a MeOH/Water Bath


, , ,

MeOH Bath - Title card3

I got a request for some more details on the methanol/water bath from a few weeks back.  Enjoy!

Step 1: Pick a Dewar and Measure the Solvents

MeOH Bath - MeasureThe desired ratios are in the last post.  For this example I’ll be making a -20 °C bath, which requires a 30:70 ratio of MeOH to water.  This Dewar holds 150 mL, so I need 100 mL of liquid.

Large Dewars are more wasteful, but maintain their temperature far better.

Step 2: Crush Dry Ice

MeOH bath - HammerYou can use large chunks of dry ice, but the powder variety cools much faster.  I fill the pictured plastic ice buckets, then crush the dry ice with the bottom of the hammer (not the claw or face).

Step 3: Mix Solvents, Fill Dewar 1/3 Full

MeOH Bath - MixTransferring  the solvent from the graduated cylinder to an erlenmeyer flask ensures good mixing.  Pour half your solvent into the Dewar.

Step 4: Add Powderized Dry Ice Until Bath Begins to Freeze

MeOH Bath - ChillThis requires about a 5:1 liquid:dry ice ratio.  A large amount of bubbles and fog will evolve at the start, so add the dry ice slowly.  The ice should remain after 10 seconds of stirring with a spatula, but the solution shouldn’t freeze solid.

Step 5: Add Remaining Solvent

MeOH Bath - Match TempThis will melt the ice and evaporate any remaining dry ice, leaving you with a bath that is approximately your desired temperature (within 10 °C or so).

Step 6: Set and Maintain the Desired Temperature with 1-2 Pieces of Dry Ice

MeOH Bath - Maintaining TempChunks of dry ice about 1.5 cm x 1 cm work best.  After about five minutes you should see a fuzzy blob of ice form around the dry ice, indicating that you are at the desired temperature.

When the bath starts to warm this blob will float to the surface, and it’s time to add another piece of dry ice.  My record  with a 500 mL Dewar is one hour at -20 °C without further dry ice addition.

Note: Cooling the bath with liquid nitrogen works similarly to the above steps, but requires active stirring after coolant addition.  LN2 has a tendency to freeze the top layer of the bath,  and this must be broken up and stirred into the liquid fraction.

To a 50 mL mixture of methanol/water (30/70) in a 150 mL Dewar flask is added approximately 10 g of crushed dry ice.  The solution is allowed to bubble for thirty seconds, during which time a large volume of CO2 gas was released and approximately 40% of the solution froze.  When gas evolution slowed a second 50 mL solution of methanol/water was added.  A dry ice pellet (cylindrical, 1 cm x .5 cm x .5 cm) was then added and the temperature was verified via ethanol/dye thermometer.  The Dewar was then used to cool a 4 mL vial for an organic reaction, and the solution remained at -20 °C for approximately 15 min without intervention.

Methanol/Water Mixtures Make Great Cooling Baths


, , , , , ,

Cooling your reaction to  0°C, -78°C or -196°C just requires ice, dry ice or liquid nitrogen.  But how do you get to a temperature in between?

Mixed Solvent Systems: Freezing Point Depression

Most undergraduate labs use mixtures of ice and salt, which can range from -10 °C to -40 °C, depending on the ratio and type of salt.  If you don’t have access to dry ice or liquid nitrogen this is probably the simplest option, though the two solids are irritating to mix and the setup can burn through surprisingly large amounts of salt [1].

You can also use mixtures of ethylene glycol and ethanol, which are useful from -10 °C to -70 °C (depending on the proportion of ethanol). As some of my recent research required odd temperatures, I started playing around with this system.  Ultimately I found that methanol/water mixtures are far more convenient and effective.

The effective cooling range of MeOH/H2O mixtures ranges from 0 °C to -128 °C (nadir at 86% methanol).  Here are a few measurements I’ve made:

Methanol Measurements

30% MeOH plateaus at -20 °C, 50% MeOH at -47 °C.

Each measurement is the warmest constant temperature, not the point of initial crystal formation.  Solvent mixtures don’t actually freeze, but instead form a slurry that on cooling slowly decreases in temperature.  This is because as water crystallizes out the proportion of methanol increases, leading to a new freezing point [2].

In my hands freezing ~10% of a 70:30 H2O:MeOH mixture wasn’t enough to shift the temperature of the bath more than a degree or so, but baths with higher methanol content were far less robust.  At 50% methanol I found a ~5 °C wide plateau 7 °C below initial ice formation, which meant that the amount of dry ice had to be carefully controlled.

One caveat: These baths are best when brought to the desired temperature and monitored every 15 minutes or so.  Adding a large excess of dry ice, as you would with an acetone/dry ice bath, will lead to a thick syrup that’s difficult to mix and far too cold. Ice still floats in the majority of methanol/water mixtures, but cubes will stay at the bottom of the Dewar if there is dry ice in their core.

The Other Options

If you need a constant, precise temperature a mixed solvent system just won’t work.  If a cryocooler is out of your price range, the next best thing is to freeze a pure liquid.  Water melts at 0 °C, but there are a lot of other chemicals in the lab, many of which are relatively inexpensive.  Freeze one of them with dry ice, make up the volume with fresh solvent, and you have a quick and dirty cooling bath [3].  Condensation will wet the bath, so if you plan on cutting costs make sure you pour the solvent into a new bottle when you’re done, not back into the communal stock.


[1] Over the summer one of our undergraduate students went though ~7 kg of NaCl, just making -20 °C cooling baths.

[2] The exception is an 88% methanol mixture, which can be frozen solid with liquid nitrogen. Working with an 86% solution I was able to create a thick syrup of consistent temperature by rapidly stirring through freeze/thaw cycles.

[3] The wikipedia page on cooling baths is surprisingly comprehensive.  Check there for specific freezing points.

Getting to Jobland


, , , ,

NavigatingI was recently gifted with a copy of “Navigating the Path to Industry: A Hiring Manager’s Advice for Academics Looking for a Job in Industry,” by M.R. Nelson.  It’s a slim volume, building on the author’s experience as a biotech hiring manager to provide a step-by-step outline to transitioning from a MS/PhD/Postdoc to your first industrial job and beyond.

The advice is both specific and practical, guiding you from the nebulous “discover what you want to do” to fielding inappropriate questions about family planning.  Little of the advice is earth-shattering, but it’s rare to see so much common sense in one place. The author should also be commended for finally offering a number of concrete benefits to signing up for LinkedIn, for example:

“Job-seekers considering different fields or making a career change [ie. from academia to industry] search their LinkedIn network to identify second level connections who might make good people to have informational interviews.  The standard procedure is to email your first level connection and ask to be introduced to the person with whom you want to have an informational interview.  Since you are being introduced by someone he or she knows, the new contact is more likely to agree to a meeting.”

Chemjobber provided his own impressions last month, which helped put the book on my radar.  Like him I highly recommend you get your own copy, and would go so far as to say it should be required reading for ~2nd year graduate students, regardless of their career aspirations.  That early in grad school the future is far from certain, and it takes several years to build a good network [1].



[1] Worst case, much of this book’s advice works equally well for finding collaborators.

Titrating Organometallic Reagents is Easier Than You Think


, , , , , ,

Recently I’ve been doing a mix of Grignards, Wittigs ,and alkyl lithium preps, necessitating quite a few titrations.  At the start I was dreading the (imagined) work involved, but in truth the process is quite painless.

Everything needed for a Grignard reagent titration.

Everything needed for the Grignard reagent titration.

Step 1. Pick a procedure.

There are a large number of different reagents that have been used at one time or another for organometallic titrations, each with their own pros and cons.  I prefer diphenylacetic acid for alkyl lithium (nBuLi, etc.) titrations and iodine/lithium chloride for Grignard reagent titrations.  If you want a one-size fits all approach, I2/LiCl will work for RMgX, RZnX, and primary/aromatic organolithium reagents.

Step 2. Dry and load your glassware.

As in most small scale reactions, these titrations are best run in a 4 mL sample vial.  Dry the vial (stir bar optional) in a 130 degC oven overnight before use, then cool in a desiccator.  The vials I use can contain the smell of isocyanides, so I consider them air-tight.

When the vial is dry, add 50 mg of either diphenylacetic acid or I2.  Iodine will react with the septa, and so should be titrated that day.  In vial under argon solid diphenylacetic acid is stable for prolonged periods, so I recommend preparing a few samples well in advance.

Step 3. Add the solvent.

For the diphenylacetic acid titration, freshly distill or dry under molecular sieves tetrahydrofuran.  Under argon flow, add one millilitre to the vial and stir/shake until the indicator is dissolved.

For the iodine titration, add 42.3 grams of LiCl to 200 mL dry THF (adjust the scale as needed).  Stir for one day, then add 40 grams of 3A molecular sieves.  Store sealed, away from light or moisture [1].  As above, add one millilitre of this mixture to the indicator.

Step 4. Titrate

While the organolithium bottle is under argon, insert a 1 mL syringe.  Draw up gas three times, each time emptying the plunger over a small beaker of either n-butanol or isopropanol 3].  Draw up 0.3-0.8 mL of organometallic solution, carefully determining the volume.  Once the reagent has been measured, draw up a further 0.2-0.3 mL of gas, then withdraw the needle such that this argon blanket sits between the tip of the needle and the solvent [4].

Maintaining this orientation, insert the needle into the vial and expel the argon blanket.  Carefully add the organometallic reagent one drop at a time, checking for either the appearance (diphenyl lithium) or absence (I2) of colour.  To ensure that the full quantity of reagent enters the THF solution, place the needle on the wall of vial, roughly 3 mm above the solvent.

When you are approaching the primary endpoint, slow the rate of addition.  When the colour just persists/vanishes, record the volume of reagent added.  Dispose of the remainder by slowly adding it to the beaker of butanol/isopropanol, then further quench the waste beaker via slow addition of ethanol or methanol.

Titrating with the iodine solution moves from dark purple to orange before arriving at a colourless endpoint.

The iodine solution goes from brown to red before its final cloudy, colourless endpoint.

Diphenylacetic acid ends at a light yellow colour.

Diphenylacetic acid ends at a light yellow colour.  A white precipitate may be visible.

Step 5. Calculate

The formula of interest:

Molaritystock = Massindicator/(MWindicator/Volumestock)

Mass of the indicator is in milligrams, volume of the stock is in millilitres.  With most syringes this value is accurate to two significant figures, though if necessary a Hamilton syringe can be used to give three sig. figs. If precise concentrations are required take the average of three titrations.

MW diphenylacetic acid: 212.24 g/mol

MW Iodine: 253.81 g/mol

Step 6. Cleanup

Both titrations can be quenched with methanol, then disposed in standard organic waste.  Be careful with the lithium chloride solution, as LiCl is a potent skin sensitizer.


[1] Like all ethers THF forms peroxides on standing.  Check for peroxides annually with a starch/iodide test strip, and dispose of any positive samples.

[2] For Grignards and nBuLi I use a disposable 1 mL BD insulin syringe, with 22 G needle.  For tBuLi or other highly flammable reagents I recommend a dedicated teflon/glass syringe, like these ones sold by chemglass.  Dry the teflon syringe in a vacuum desiccator before use, never heat.

[3] Always keep a bottle of sand nearby for small organometallic spills and a fire extinguisher within reach for larger fires.  Reorganize the fumehood so that flammable solvent bottles (especially diethyl ether) are far from the area in which you are working.

[4] This prevents the reagent from reacting with air or dripping from the tip.  Either situation can cause a fire under the wrong circumstances.

Preparing For Independent Research

“Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan Press On! has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.”
Calvin Coolidge

Every lab has a multitude of research notebooks, physical or electronic.  As a student, the lab book is the most obvious record of your trials and tribulations: the experiments that worked and the many failed attempts. Alongside your thesis, lab books are also the most obvious sign of your passage.  They’re history in solid form.

Let’s talk about the future.

The tail end of a PhD isn’t just for sagely offering advice to incoming students and slowly reducing lab hours to focus on “writing.”  It’s also the time to buy a new notebook.  A nice one, faux leather or perhaps moleskin.  This book isn’t for your PhD, or the post-doc, if you’re planning on going that way.  Rather, it’s a place to collect all the ideas, potential projects, and marketable inventions that inspire you.  This is a book for your independent career [1].

Reading Ahead

To steal from Stephen King, if you want to be a scientist, you must do two things above all others: read a lot and write a lot. There’s no way around these two things that I’m aware of, no shortcut.

Great ideas require inspiration, and seeing the work of others inspires.  Over the past eighteen months I’ve read more papers than the past five years combined, even on one occasion skimming through the entirety of the the 1965 volume of the Journal of the Chemical Society (resumed) [2].  Voracious reading lets you link disparate observations into new ideas, and with your own experiences sometimes you see an experiment and wonder, “what would happen if I tried these conditions on this substrate?”  Conferences and seminars can have the same effect, but the literature is far broader and always available.

Being inundated with information, it’s important to view each paper in the context of your research interests [3].  This will skew your view, which means you just might see something the original authors didn’t [4].

Work It Out

Alright, let’s say you were browsing the JACS ASAPs, and you’ve hit on a connection to some 1980’s Tet. Lett. paper.  Quick, write it in the notebook!  Good.  Now, let’s see if it’s worth pursuing.

First, search the literature.  High impact research tends to be pretty obvious, so there’s a good chance that someone else has hit on the same connection.  A quick search on Scifinder, Web of Science, and Google can determine if the idea was worked to its logical conclusion long before you were born.

If you read enough, as the months go on you’ll start to accumulate a fair number of ideas, to the point where it’s not feasible to investigate them all.  To triage I focus on three core questions:

1. Is the idea novel?

Does it stand out from prior work?  If someone has hit on something related to your idea then there’s less to disclose and subsequently less impact.

2. Will this change how people work?

Does this meet an unmet need?  There are a lot of ways to making amides, but not too many for nitriles.  Nitriles are pretty useful, so that represents an unmet need that you could fill.

3. How can you demonstrate the impact?

If your idea is important, prove it.  If you have a new reaction, this generally means making an challenging natural product or therapeutic with ease.  If it’s a med. chem. project, you could demonstrate impact by testing against a whole cell or model organism (collaboration will probably be required; network early).  Keep the demonstration simple; the goal is not to wag the dog.

Show Your Work

Once you have about a half-dozen ideas, it’s time to take the best and start filling in the details.  Ultimately the goal is to get hired/get funded/start a company, and the only way to do that is to convince people that what you want to do will work.  Hope Jahren has put together an extremely good write-up on how to turn an OK proposal into a great one, so in the interest of brevity I’ll point you her way.  If you’re looking for a quick proposal outline, I wrote one up some time, and Kenneth Hanson covered his style as part of a larger series on getting an academic job.

Writing budgets and triple-checking for typos isn’t necessarily fun, but to paraphrase Hope Jahren, think of what you’re asking for.  Hiring and paying a new professor until tenure review costs any given university the better part of a million dollars in start up funds, overhead and salary.  If you had a million dollars lying around, how likely are you to give it to me?

I’d need to be pretty convincing.

Find the Time

Looking over everything, I’m asking for a pretty big investment of your time.  Say 20 hours per bolt of inspiration (~3 bolts per viable idea), another 20 to develop the idea, and anywhere from 20 to 80 hours to write and hone the proposal.  That’s almost a month of dedicated time, sandwiched in between all of your other responsibilities.

Like thesis writing, the best policy is to find a 1-3 hour block of time in your week that generally isn’t productive, and dedicate that to this effort.  For me this tends to be ~8-10 in the evenings (prime blog writing time, unfortunately), Sunday mornings, and Friday afternoons.  Your times may vary, but the point is to dedicate some period to producing excellent research ideas.  With persistent effort you can do anything.


[1] Think of the notebook as a cliffs notes guide to your ideas, not a comprehensive guide.  You’ll also need to accumulate supporting references and eventually prepare formal proposals and talks, but there’s no need to carry those wherever you go.

[2] By the end I had fifty or so papers worth looking into a little closer, and one or two that gave me ideas of my own.  Other sighs of obsessiveness include the Dictionary of Natural Products, and Wikipedia’s List of Organic Reactions, all 700 or so entries.  Most of the reactions didn’t stick, but I now know at least a half-dozen different transformations that are really just variations on the Swern Oxidation.

[3] As a bit of an explanation, one of my interests is nitrogen.  Whether that entails nitrogen containing natural products or reactions, I’ve decided my work must involve this bit of the periodic table in some way.  So whenever I see an Aldol, Heck and Pinacol reaction I start adding in nitrogen atoms.  The first two cases give me the Stork-Enamine and Hartwig-Buchwald reactions, but that third…hmm.

[4] Knowing what to focus on is a post in and of itself, and one that’s proven stubbornly resistant to writing.

NMR Solvent Residual Peak Concentrations


, ,

I’m just going to leave this here, for the next time I (or anyone else) want to determine the in-tube concentration of an NMR sample.[1,2]

Solvent [Residual] in mM
Acetic Acid-d4 27.1
Acetone-d6 2.30
Acetonitrile-d3 13.1
Benzene-d6 9.52
Chloroform-d 25.1
Dimethylsulfoxide-d6 2.38
Methanol-d4 12.7
Pyridine-d4 14.8
Tetrahydrofuran-d8 7.78
Toluene-d8 5.94
Water-d2 145



Values are derived from this formula:


x = the posted deuterium purity (ie. “99.8%” CDCl3)
y= number of hydrogen/deterium atoms per molecule.
d = density of the deutero solvent.
MW for residual solvent (ex. CHD3O for methanol)

Here’s the spreadsheet.

[1] Low concentration samples can be calculated by using the 13C satellite bands, which are 1/200 the concentration of the standard residual peak.

[2] For water, rinse the NMR tube, vial, etc. with D2O prior to dissolving your sample.

10 Things that I would rather do than run a difficult flash column

  1. A convoluted extraction series.
  2. Change the limiting reagent.
  3. Distillation.
  4. Trituration / Sohxlet.
  5. Prolonged high vacuum treatment.
  6. Recrystallization.
  7. The bisulfite/DNPH trick (aldehydes only).
  8. Secondary reactions [1].
  9. HPLC.
  10. The next reaction in the series.

[1] Protections, oxidations, etc.  Ex. Contaminant an amine?  Treat with acetyl chloride and base.  RF shoots up, and the column is no longer difficult.  Transient protections are also useful for 1,3-diketones and other tautomeric structures.

How to Activate Molecular Sieves


, ,

Molecular SievesSieves are a beautiful invention, as I’ve said before.  At 10-20% w/v, 3A molecular sieves will dry every common solvent except acetone as well or significantly better than a solvent still [1, 2].  A bottle of sieves/solvent is also far less likely to catch on fire and is far cheaper to maintain (no argon or water lines).

Unfortunately, sieves are shipped saturated with water and must be dried before use.  Sieves actually absorb water at 120 degC, so a conventional drying oven is not up to the task.

Conventional wisdom is that heating to 300 degC or greater at atmospheric pressure will dry sieves, and this temperature can be reduced somewhat under vacuum [3].  Experimentally I had some success heating to ~200 degC overnight in a vacuum oven, but was never quite sure that the sieves were fully active [4].

Holding the sieves at 350 degC for 3.5 hours is the right amount of overkill.  While this is a temperature out of reach of most drying ovens, it barely hits “medium” on the temperature setting of a glassblower’s annealing oven.

An annealing oven.  So pretty...

That’ll do.

When drying sieves go for economy of scale.  Large recrystallization dishes will hold up to about 4 kg at a time (190×100 mm), and have the advantage of being ~1.5 cm smaller in diametre than an average size glass desiccator.  Once they’ve been activated let the sieves cool to ~150 degC in the annealing oven, then transfer them over.  Take care to fill the desiccator with drying agent to at least the height of the inner glass studs, as contact between the hot recrystallizing dish and cold ceramic/glass will almost certainly shatter one or both.

Take care to cover the glass baffles (left) with drierite.  The recrystallization dish should fit within the dessicator without touching the sides (right).

Take care to cover the glass baffles (left) with drierite. The recrystallization dish should fit within the dessicator without touching the sides (right).

Active sieves can be stored in any convenient glass container, provided the lid is well sealed.  Double wrapped parafilm works well, sufficient to keep the sieves active for at least six months.

[1] Sieves are mildly basic, which triggers aldol reactions in acetone and can decompose some compounds.  For example, after prolonged storage (8-10 months) of triethylamine over 3A sieves I’ve noticed a yellow discolouration in the solvent, likely due to formation of diethylamine.

[2] Larger sieves are recommended for the drying of some solvents (ie. 5A for pyridine).  The difference in final water concentration is pretty negligible though, and the larger sieves can trap solvents like methanol, reducing their utility.

[3] Flame drying in a roundbottom flask under vacuum was standard approach when I arrived in Alberta, but was good for only small quantities.

[4] How to determine if molecular sieves are active: Place a small quantity on a gloved hand, and add roughly two volume equivalents of water.  If the sieves are fully active they will become too hot to hold, even through the glove.


The past is truly a foreign country.  From the letters to the editor page of Chemistry and Industry, December 19th, 1964 (page 2096):

Ingenuity in the Lab

Ingenuity in the Laboratory

SIR, — In the far-distant days of my youth, I once formed part of a group of young chemists newly recruited to a laboratory in the very early stages of its fitting-out.  The equipment was then so sparse that although well stocked with reagents, the available apparatus lacked those necessities which enter into the brewing of the cup that cheers.  I still remember, oddly enough, that a large weird-looking tripod stand, bearing a rotatable numbered ring, subsequently identified on later arrival of the missing parts as an immersion refractometer, was adapted for use as an exciting roulette and served to mitigate the boredom of our enforced idleness.

The traditional “elevenses” being denied us, youthful ingenuity soon led to the discovery of a satisfactory ersatz assuagement in the form of a mixture of absolute alcohol and ethyl acetate, suitably diluted with a solution of chloroform in water.  Fortunately for us, the arrival of Bunsen burners, flasks, etc. coupled with an official check on the stock of alcohol, soon saved us from premature addiction to the morning cocktail.

Years later, a visit to the U.S.A. during prohibition days gave me the opportunity of vividly recalling the potency and special bouquet of our tipple.

Yours faithfully,

8 Fairgreen Court,

Emphasis mine.  As though breathing solvents isn’t bad enough.

Finding Alkyl Halides in 13C NMR



Hat tip to a recent talk by Chris Braddock.

79/81Bromine and 35/37chlorine are easy to see in a mass spectrum, as their isotopic abundance leads to characteristic M/M+2 molecular ion ratios (1:1 for bromine, 3:1 for chlorine).  Still, it can be tough to determine the exact location of said bromine/chlorine by NMR, especially if the compound contains a mix of halides.

13C functional group shifts. The 0-50ppm region is a little crowded.

13C functional group shifts. The 0-50ppm region is a little crowded.


However, with the varied atomic mass the bromine/chlorine isotopes have slightly different C-X bond lengths.  This means the carbons experience ever so slightly different environments, with a corresponding change in shift [1].   Alkyl chlorides experience a change of about 0.1hz, enough to see peak doubling on modern spectrometers (turn off window functions/apodization).

1-Chloro-3-Iodopropane NMR (close-up)Unfortunately bromine causes less than half the same shift, a difference that’s invisible absent extremely high fields or custom pulse sequences.  Under normal conditions the bromine-induced doublet instead shows up as a single peak, about 50% broader than the other carbons in my survey of 1-bromopentane.



[1] The clearest explanation I’ve heard is that the shorter C-X bond length slightly shields the carbons, by bringing electrons from the halide closer to the carbon’s nucleus.  Potentially an oversimplification.